Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
| 2 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | 6% | 31% | 47% | 16% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 28% |
| 3 | LI Simon A. | - | 3% | 22% | 45% | 26% | 4% |
| 5 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 28% |
| 6 | COLON Cesar L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 7 | CANNON Caiden | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 36% | |
| 8 | PITCHER Skylar L. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 9 | BARLETTA Joseph | - | 8% | 37% | 43% | 12% | |
| 10 | HAY Gavin | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 8% |
| 11 | PETREE Justin | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
| 12 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 29% |
| 14 | HAINES Ethan | - | 3% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 5% |
| 15 | JACOBS Tyler M. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 16 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 1% | 12% | 40% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | BOLTON Lucas R. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 39% |
| 18 | RYAN Connor Q. | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | FREEMAN Paris | 1% | 18% | 48% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 20 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | 36% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHAO Jason L. | 1% | 16% | 42% | 34% | 7% | |
| 22 | WATERS Will T. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 22 | ANDERSON David C. | 1% | 13% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | GUTIERREZ Jose J. | 11% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 25 | RINEHART Conner M. | - | 9% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | TAYLOR Nolan J. | 12% | 47% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SZELA Tom J. | 67% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 28 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | RYAN Ben | 3% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | OBERYSZYN Evan | 14% | 55% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 63% | 34% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | UPTON Craig | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | SCHECHTER Nathan L. | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BOLD Timothy | 66% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.