San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SARON Mitchell S. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
2 | HOMER Daryl D. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
3 | WILLIAMS Grant W. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
3 | BOOTH Zaheer | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
5 | MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 78% |
6 | COHEN Josef A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
7 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | - | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
8 | ARFA Fares | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
9 | SOLOMON Daniel P. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 49% | 26% |
10 | VIDOVSZKY Robert T. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
11 | THOMPSON Khalil A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
12 | SMITH Jared C. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 42% |
13 | TE VELDE Noah C. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% |
14 | MATRICCIANI NOAH | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% |
15 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
16 | DINU Nicholas D. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
17 | CAUCHON Francois | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
19 | WEI Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
20 | RABINOWITZ Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
21 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
22 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
23 | OH Jason H. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
24 | FIELDS Malcolm D. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
25 | MULLENNIX Ethan M. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
25 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 40% |
27 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | DOLEGIEWICZ Filip | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
29 | JI Cody Walter | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
30 | LO Joshua H. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
31 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
32 | BARBER William S. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | WOOD Elden S. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
34 | MOON Sean H. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
35 | ZU Kevin | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 16% | |
36 | MCBRIDE Jackson R. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 10% |
37 | ARMIJO Gabriel K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
38 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
39 | MEHTA Sachin N. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 37% | 5% |
40 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
41 | KOGAN Benjamin | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
42 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 2% |
43 | KIM Shaun M. | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
44 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
45 | WALKER Dalton F. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 48% | 7% |
46 | FRIAS SAUL F. | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
47 | HU William | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
48 | ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
49 | BERMAN Luca | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
50 | DESROSIERS Olivier | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
51 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
52 | NOBLE Daniel | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
53 | BIVINS III George A. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
54 | DENNER Maximilian P. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | LAI Adam J. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
55 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | BRAR Sanjeet | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
58 | SCHMITT Trenton R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 11% |
59 | JOHNSON Andrew J. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
59 | SMITH David C. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
61 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
62 | RAI Avin | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
63 | HONG Vincent Q. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | HUSSAIN Faaris | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
65 | LINDHOLM Oliver S. | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
66 | DODRILL Grant | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
67 | REN Junming | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
68 | LIN Xiteng (Steven) | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
69 | MORRILL William | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
70 | JOHNSON Zachary (Zack) C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 17% |
71 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
72 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
73 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% | - |
73 | WU Mengke | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
75 | JIANG Anthony | 6% | 31% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
76 | YEN Darren | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
77 | BERRIO Carter E. | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
77 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 1% |
79 | YAKO george | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
80 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
81 | ZUBATIY Samuel | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
82 | SO Hananiah | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
83 | CHON Taylor A. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
84 | PARK Justin W. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
85 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
86 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
87 | BULL Anderson | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
87 | TANN Justin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
89 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
90 | KIM Charlson | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
90 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
92 | MORRILL Justin | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
93 | TONG Qilin | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
94 | BARRETO Elliott | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
95 | GUAY-TARDIF Xavier | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
96 | KULDELL Spencer D. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
97 | YANG Richard | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
98 | STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
99 | HOLZ Daniel | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
101 | BREIER Satchel E. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
102 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
103 | JOHNSON Langston C. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
104 | KOTOV Leonid | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
105 | LUEBBE Macklan C | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
106 | REN Richard | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
107 | BEAM David E. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
108 | WIND Nicky E. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
109 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
110 | REYES Xavier M. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | |
111 | ATANASSOV Vasil V. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
112 | LIANG Connor | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
113 | HOLZ William A. | 16% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
114 | HAST Kern R. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
114 | MERCHANT Marcel J. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
116 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
117 | HO Kaden M. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
118 | LUO George F. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
118 | TONG ZACHARY | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
120 | JINICH Ilan R. | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
121 | BERGER Oliver | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
121 | CHANG Colin S. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
123 | PAN Jerry | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
124 | NIL Michael Y. | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
124 | HAN Daniel Y. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
124 | BARBER Brendan | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
127 | CHAN Matthew | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
127 | LIU kelly | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
129 | FALLICK Ozzie | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
130 | MICHELL Bailey | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
130 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
132 | PAN Andrew W. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
132 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
134 | WANG Robert | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
135 | COVINGTON Max G. | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
136 | LASORSA Matthew | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
137 | BEITEL Noah | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
137 | ALTIRS Alexander | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
139 | CHEN Howard | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
140 | LEE Aydan J. | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
141 | WOODWARD Dylan P. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
142 | XU William | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
143 | XU Andrew | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
144 | GHAYALOD ansh | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
145 | YUN Jake | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
146 | ERMAKOV Lev | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
147 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
148 | BUENAVENTURA Christian | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
149 | XU Luke | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
150 | SCHERER Max | 30% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
151 | WOODWARD Connor | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
152 | GHENEA George Philipe | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
153 | LE Hayden | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
154 | QIU Nathan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
155 | RAJA Arnav | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
156 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
157 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 9% | 35% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
158 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
159 | CHEONG Heonjae | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
160 | HUANG Zekai | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
161 | YANG Ziyi | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
161 | STONE Esmond A. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
161 | MARGULIES William | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
164 | MURZYN III CJ | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
165 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
165 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
165 | VO Minh Q. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.