January NAC

Div I Men's Saber

Friday, January 7, 2022 at 2:00 PM

San Jose, CA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 SARON Mitchell S. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.7 6 +0.3
2 HOMER Daryl D. V V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
3 WILLIAMS Grant W. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
3 BOOTH Zaheer D V D D V V V V V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
5 MACKIEWICZ Andrew A. V V V V V V V V V D 5.8 6 +0.2
6 COHEN Josef A. V V D V V V V V V V D 5.7 5 -0.7
7 CHOI HYUNSEOK V V V V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
8 ARFA Fares V D V D V V V V V D 5.7 4 -1.7
9 SOLOMON Daniel P. V D V V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
10 VIDOVSZKY Robert T. V V D V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
11 THOMPSON Khalil A. D V V V V V V V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
12 SMITH Jared C. V D D V V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
13 TE VELDE Noah C. D V D V V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
14 MATRICCIANI NOAH V D D V V D V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
15 DENNER Lysander H. D V V D V D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 DINU Nicholas D. D V D V D V V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
17 CAUCHON Francois V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
19 WEI Andrew D V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
20 RABINOWITZ Benjamin D V V V V V V V D 4.6 5 +0.4
21 ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. V D V V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
22 KUSHKOV Simon O. V D V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
23 OH Jason H. V V V V D V V V D 5.0 5 -
24 FIELDS Malcolm D. D D V V V V V V D 5.3 4 -1.3
25 MULLENNIX Ethan M. V V V D V D V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
25 HARLEY Colby A. D V V D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
27 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. V V V D D V V V D 2.2 4 +1.8
28 DOLEGIEWICZ Filip V V D V V D V V D 5.4 4 -1.4
29 JI Cody Walter V V V D D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
30 LO Joshua H. V D V V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
31 HARVEY Nicholas J. D D V D V D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
32 BARBER William S. D V D D V D V V D 2.1 2 -0.1
33 WOOD Elden S. V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
34 MOON Sean H. V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
35 ZU Kevin V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
36 MCBRIDE Jackson R. V V V D V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
37 ARMIJO Gabriel K. D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
38 CALLAHAN Jaden P. D V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
39 MEHTA Sachin N. V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
40 DHINGRA Gian K. V V V V D V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
41 KOGAN Benjamin V D V V V V D 1.2 4 +2.8
42 TRAVERS Samir T. V D V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
43 KIM Shaun M. V V V D V D V D 1.5 4 +2.5
44 HAMMERSTROM Jared V D V V V D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
45 WALKER Dalton F. D V V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
46 FRIAS SAUL F. V D V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
47 HU William D V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
48 ZIELINSKI Nicholaus M. D V V V V D V 2.8 4 +1.2
49 BERMAN Luca D V V V D D V D 2.0 3 +1.0
50 DESROSIERS Olivier V V D V D D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
51 SOHN Kevin J. D V V V D D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
52 NOBLE Daniel D V D V V D V D 3.0 3 -
53 BIVINS III George A. V D D V D V V D 4.7 3 -1.7
54 DENNER Maximilian P. D V V D D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
55 LAI Adam J. V D D V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
55 KAYDALIN Artyom V V D V D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
57 BRAR Sanjeet D V V D V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
58 SCHMITT Trenton R. V V D D D V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
59 JOHNSON Andrew J. D V D V V D V D 4.1 3 -1.1
59 SMITH David C. D V V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
61 BENAVRAM Lev C. V V D V D D V D 3.0 3 -
62 RAI Avin V V D D D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
63 HONG Vincent Q. D D V V D V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
64 HUSSAIN Faaris V D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
65 LINDHOLM Oliver S. V D V V V V D 1.4 5 +3.6
66 DODRILL Grant V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
67 REN Junming D V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
68 LIN Xiteng (Steven) V V D V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
69 MORRILL William V V V V D V D 3.3 5 +1.7
70 JOHNSON Zachary (Zack) C. D V V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
71 LINSKY Matthew V V D V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
72 WILLIAMS Nolan E. V D V V V D D 4.1 4 -0.1
73 RIVERA Inigo Franco V V V D V D D 3.4 4 +0.6
73 WU Mengke V V V D D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
75 JIANG Anthony V D V D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
76 YEN Darren V V D V V D D 4.2 4 -0.2
77 BERRIO Carter E. V V V V D D D 1.8 4 +2.2
77 JEFFORDS Alexander V D V V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
79 YAKO george V V V V D D D 3.8 4 +0.2
80 LIMB Matthew G. D V V D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
81 ZUBATIY Samuel D V V V D V D 2.0 4 +2.0
82 SO Hananiah V V V V D D D 3.4 4 +0.6
83 CHON Taylor A. D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
84 PARK Justin W. V V D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
85 BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. D V V D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
86 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo D V D D V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
87 BULL Anderson D V V D V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
87 TANN Justin V V D V D D D 2.9 3 +0.1
89 NAZLYMOV Andrei V V D V D D D 1.2 3 +1.8
90 KIM Charlson V V D D D V D 4.6 3 -1.6
90 PAN Jack (Yuxiang) D V V D V D D 2.6 3 +0.4
92 MORRILL Justin D V V D V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
93 TONG Qilin D V D V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
94 BARRETO Elliott D D V V V D D 3.3 3 -0.3
95 GUAY-TARDIF Xavier V D D V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
96 KULDELL Spencer D. D V D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
97 YANG Richard D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
98 STATEN-LUSTY Silas J. D V D V D V D 3.0 3 -
99 HOLZ Daniel D V V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
100 BARTOLO Domenic V. V D V D D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
101 BREIER Satchel E. V D D V V D D 2.8 3 +0.2
102 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. D D V V V D D 1.2 3 +1.8
103 JOHNSON Langston C. D V D D V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
104 KOTOV Leonid V D D V D V D 1.6 3 +1.4
105 LUEBBE Macklan C V D V V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
106 REN Richard V D D V V D D 1.1 3 +1.9
107 BEAM David E. V D V V D D D 1.7 3 +1.3
108 WIND Nicky E. D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
109 EICHHORN Lukas H. D D D V V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
110 REYES Xavier M. V D V D D D 2.0 2 -
111 ATANASSOV Vasil V. V D V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
112 LIANG Connor D V D D V D D 3.4 2 -1.4
113 HOLZ William A. V D D D D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
114 HAST Kern R. D V V D D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
114 MERCHANT Marcel J. D D V D D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
116 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. V D D V D D 4.0 2 -2.0
117 HO Kaden M. V D D D V D D 2.2 2 -0.2
118 LUO George F. D D V V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
118 TONG ZACHARY D D D V V D D 2.1 2 -0.1
120 JINICH Ilan R. D D D V D V D 2.0 2 -
121 BERGER Oliver V D D D D V 2.4 2 -0.4
121 CHANG Colin S. V D D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
123 PAN Jerry V D V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
124 NIL Michael Y. V D D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
124 HAN Daniel Y. V D D D D V D 1.7 2 +0.3
124 BARBER Brendan V D D D V D D 1.6 2 +0.4
127 CHAN Matthew D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
127 LIU kelly D D V D D V 1.8 2 +0.2
129 FALLICK Ozzie D V D D D V 2.5 2 -0.5
130 MICHELL Bailey D D V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
130 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. D D D V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
132 PAN Andrew W. D D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
132 BASALYGA Jeffrey V D D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
134 WANG Robert D D V D V D 0.6 2 +1.4
135 COVINGTON Max G. V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
136 LASORSA Matthew D D V V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
137 BEITEL Noah V D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
137 ALTIRS Alexander D D D D V V 1.9 2 +0.1
139 CHEN Howard D V D D D V 3.3 2 -1.3
140 LEE Aydan J. D D D V D 0.8 1 +0.2
141 WOODWARD Dylan P. D D D V D D 2.2 1 -1.2
142 XU William D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
143 XU Andrew D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
144 GHAYALOD ansh D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
145 YUN Jake D D V D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
146 ERMAKOV Lev D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
147 SAKHAMURI Surya D D D V D D 3.5 1 -2.5
148 BUENAVENTURA Christian D D D D D V 3.5 1 -2.5
149 XU Luke D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
150 SCHERER Max D D D D D V 1.0 1 -
151 WOODWARD Connor D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
152 GHENEA George Philipe D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
153 LE Hayden D D V D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
154 QIU Nathan D D V D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
155 RAJA Arnav V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
156 SHIRPAL Oleksandr D D D D D V 2.4 1 -1.4
157 GREENBAUM Ian L. D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
158 ROSBERG Dashiell W. V D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
159 CHEONG Heonjae D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
160 HUANG Zekai D D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
161 YANG Ziyi D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
161 STONE Esmond A. D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
161 MARGULIES William D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
164 MURZYN III CJ D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
165 BIERNACKI Maciej L. D D D D D D 3.9 0 -3.9
165 MAKLIN Edward P. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
165 VO Minh Q. D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.