San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 46% | 6% |
2 | STREB Joseph S. | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 55% |
3 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
3 | BUCHWALD Alan | - | 7% | 29% | 45% | 18% | 1% |
5 | MAYER Richard | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
6 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
7 | HAMBARZUMIAN Heik | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
8 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | 16% | 47% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
9 | SESSIONS Adrian | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
10 | CATES Archie W. | 2% | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
11 | HILL David E. | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
12 | REA John P. | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.