San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | PATTERSON Jan (Janmon) M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 6% |
2 | STREB Joseph S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% |
3 | MCCARTHY Daniel (Dan) W. | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
3 | BUCHWALD Alan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 19% | 1% |
5 | MAYER Richard | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
6 | KAZIMIROFF Paul B. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
7 | HAMBARZUMIAN Heik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
8 | PIATKOWSKI-NAZARRO RPT Marek W. | 100% | 84% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | SESSIONS Adrian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
10 | CATES Archie W. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
11 | HILL David E. | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
12 | REA John P. | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.