San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KETKAR Ketki | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
2 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 31% |
3 | HUSISIAN Hadley N. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
3 | TYLER Syd | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
5 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% |
6 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
7 | PIRKOWSKI Amanda L. | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
8 | PARK Faith K. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
9 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% |
10 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
11 | WANG Karen | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
12 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
13 | LEUNG Natalie | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
14 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
15 | CHU Audrey | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
16 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
17 | LEE Michelle J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
18 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
19 | GU Sarah | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
20 | WANG Nora | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% |
21 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
22 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
23 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% |
24 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
25 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
26 | WATRALL Christina | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 22% | |
27 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
28 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
29 | XIAO Ruien | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
30 | HU Grace | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 44% | 9% |
31 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
32 | LIU Christina A. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 3% |
33 | OXENREIDER Tierna A. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 51% |
34 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 18% | |
35 | WANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 44% | 16% | |
36 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
37 | JOYCE Michaela | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
38 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
39 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 8% |
40 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 40% | 9% |
41 | REID Anousheh | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
42 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 3% | 25% | 43% | 25% | 4% | |
43 | MCLANE Lauren | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
44 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
45 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
46 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
47 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | - | 1% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 8% | - |
48 | DONDISCH Sophia | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
49 | YU Nicole J. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
50 | PANT Anisha | 16% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
51 | CHEN Lefu | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 4% |
52 | NI Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
53 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
54 | WEISS Talia L. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
55 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
56 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 2% | 20% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
57 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 1% | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
58 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
59 | WONG Alexandra R. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
60 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
61 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | |
62 | HABERMAN Hailey | 13% | 59% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
63 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
64 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 3% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | WU Amelia | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
66 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
67 | RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
68 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
69 | BEI Karen | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
70 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
71 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
72 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
73 | LIN Waiyuk | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
74 | DARANOUVONG Logan | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
75 | MING Cynthia | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
76 | KETKAR Mallika | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% |
77 | MUN Brianna K. | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
78 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 24% | 4% | |
79 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | 5% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
80 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
81 | MILLER Veronica | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
82 | REID Sobia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
83 | HUANG Lanlan | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
84 | WEBER Nora | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
85 | LI Alisha | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
86 | PARKER Allegra H. | - | - | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
86 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 2% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
88 | PAN Michelle | - | 10% | 48% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
89 | LU Junyao | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
90 | MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
91 | LEE Sumin | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
92 | SHEN Stephanie | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
93 | DESAI Meera P. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
94 | KELLY Jenna | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
95 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
96 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
97 | NING Emma | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
98 | YIN Julia | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
99 | BARNOW Sasha | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
101 | LONADIER Keira | - | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
102 | TAN Jocelyn | 23% | 46% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
103 | KIM Jayna | 3% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
104 | LEE Natasha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
105 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
106 | KALE Anika A. | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
107 | HAU Olivia | 20% | 46% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
108 | MALLAVARPU Saanvi | 4% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
109 | LEE Olive | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - |
110 | MYERS Helen Sophia A. | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
111 | KIZILBASH Zara | 2% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
112 | CHANG Ella | 20% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
113 | YAO KATHARINE | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
114 | LIN Ashley | 10% | 49% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
115 | MAO Amy | - | 2% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 5% | |
116 | ANDERSON Claire | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
116 | SHARMA Sanvi | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
116 | LAN Alice S. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
119 | PRIHODKO Nina | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
120 | POPOVICI Alina B. | 5% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
121 | POON Desiree | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
122 | UYANIK Nerine | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
123 | DALEY Keira | 12% | 64% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - |
124 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
125 | HSIU Elizabeth | 37% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
126 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
127 | GAO Judy | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
128 | DUONG Zoey | 52% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
129 | XU Katelyn | 15% | 68% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
130 | GILKES Sanojah Ruby | 14% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
131 | LOUIE Sarah | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
132 | XU Celina | 78% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
133 | RAUSCH Juliana | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
134 | CHA Eugenie | 35% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
135 | CHANG Celine A. | 28% | 43% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
136 | YIN Grace | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
136 | WAGLE Vaishali | 43% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
138 | LI Charlotte | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
139 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | < 1% | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
140 | LIANG Jingjing | 69% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
141 | ENRILE Erica | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
142 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 40% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
143 | LEE Samantha X. | 51% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
144 | DAYAL Saahira | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
145 | ESTRADA Ariana | 75% | 23% | 1% | - | - | - | |
146 | DERAKSHANDEH Donya | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
146 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
148 | YIN Gabriela | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
149 | BHATT Anisha | 80% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.