San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BERMAN Frauke | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 2 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 3 | GLUCK Myriam | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | DENNER Jasmina | - | 5% | 27% | 44% | 24% | |
| 5 | FOLEY Eileen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 35% |
| 6 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 1% | 26% | 43% | 25% | 5% | |
| 7 | ALTMAN Leigh | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | |
| 8 | OISHI Yoko | 44% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 9 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 10 | ENOCHS Liz | - | 7% | 30% | 43% | 19% | |
| 11 | DREYER Nadia S. | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
| 12 | ARNECKE Margaret A. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 13 | WILKERSON Mary B. | 1% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 14 | DEGEN Anita L. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | THORNTON Eva | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 16 | MARSH Lisa | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.