San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | - | - | - | - | 7% | 40% | 53% |
| 2 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 3 | CRANOR Erich L. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 3 | BARREIRO Darren | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 5 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 6 | EXUM Travis H. | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 19% |
| 7 | HELGE James R. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 8 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 9 | FRANK Fred | - | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
| 11 | MEHALL Michael | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 12 | KURITZ Marc M. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 13 | GAINES Aaron | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
| 14 | EMARA Elsayed M. | 1% | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | BAILEY Creston P. | - | 2% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 9% | |
| 16 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 17 | LUONG Allen | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 18 | GUMAGAY Paul | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 19 | LEE Stephen K. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 20 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 22 | STEWART Robert | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Steve | 12% | 36% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | ROOD Alex | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | |
| 26 | BECK Brian C. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 27 | HARGROVE Charles | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | UNGER Marc A. | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 3% | 48% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WEINTRAUB Adam | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LIU Bobby P. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
| 32 | REID Michael | 8% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | KONG Li Kuo | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | BEITTEL David F. | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | LOGUE Paul | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | DUONG John | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | WIESE Michael | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 38 | ROGERS John D. | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KAIN Brad | 33% | 44% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FUHRMANN Amir | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.