San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% |
| 2 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 3 | CRANOR Erich L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
| 3 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | |
| 5 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 10% | |
| 6 | EXUM Travis H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 19% |
| 7 | HELGE James R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 8 | GILLHAM Timothy A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
| 9 | FRANK Fred | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
| 10 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 11 | MEHALL Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 12 | KURITZ Marc M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 13 | GAINES Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% |
| 14 | EMARA Elsayed M. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | BAILEY Creston P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | |
| 16 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | GUMAGAY Paul | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | LEE Stephen K. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 20 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
| 21 | WILSON Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 22 | STEWART Robert | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 23 | CHEN Steve | 100% | 88% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | LINGVAY Laurance (Larry) S. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | ROOD Alex | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | |
| 26 | BECK Brian C. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | HARGROVE Charles | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | UNGER Marc A. | 100% | 91% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | CAMPBELL Kenneth | 100% | 97% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | WEINTRAUB Adam | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | LIU Bobby P. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
| 32 | REID Michael | 100% | 92% | 57% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | KONG Li Kuo | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | BEITTEL David F. | 100% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | LOGUE Paul | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 36 | DUONG John | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | WIESE Michael | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 38 | ROGERS John D. | 100% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 39 | KAIN Brad | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FUHRMANN Amir | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.