Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TAQI Ahmad F. | V D V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 2 | PEDERSEN Trevor | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | V V D V D | V V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 5 | CANNON Caiden | V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 6 | SPEVAK Alexander | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | BRATTON Jack S. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 8 | BARLETTA Joseph | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | HERGAN Daniel | V V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 10 | PITCHER Skylar L. | D V V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 11 | ANDERSON David C. | D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 12 | HAY Gavin | D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 13 | JACOBS Tyler M. | V D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | LI Simon A. | V V V D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 15 | ROBINSON Keegan | V D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | WATERS Will T. | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | RITCHIE Luke W. | D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 18 | HAYENGA Gary M. | V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | CHITU Julian S. | D V V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 20 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | MAHDI Mahdi | V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 22 | PETREE Justin | D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 23 | FREEMAN Paris | D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 24 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 25 | RYAN Connor Q. | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 26 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | D D V D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | GU Jeffrey | D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 28 | ROAT Kyle A. | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 29 | ANEZ Daniel A. | V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 31 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 31 | GHAZALI Omer | D D D D D | V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 33 | HAINES Ethan | D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 34 | JUSCINSKI Michal | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 35 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.