The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Arnold Fencing Classic

Div I-A Men's Foil

Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 TAQI Ahmad F. - - 1% 7% 35% 58%
2 PEDERSEN Trevor - 2% 12% 32% 39% 15%
3 ROMANOV Michael 1% 6% 21% 35% 29% 9%
3 O'BRIEN Jack K. 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
5 CANNON Caiden - - 7% 35% 58%
6 SPEVAK Alexander - 1% 9% 29% 41% 20%
7 BRATTON Jack S. - - 1% 10% 37% 52%
8 BARLETTA Joseph - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
9 HERGAN Daniel - 7% 26% 39% 23% 4%
10 PITCHER Skylar L. 2% 27% 45% 23% 3%
11 ANDERSON David C. 1% 7% 27% 41% 22% 2%
12 HAY Gavin 1% 8% 29% 39% 20% 3%
13 JACOBS Tyler M. - 8% 31% 39% 19% 3%
14 LI Simon A. 1% 13% 34% 36% 15% 2%
15 ROBINSON Keegan 1% 11% 31% 37% 18% 2%
16 WATERS Will T. 12% 33% 34% 17% 4% -
17 RITCHIE Luke W. - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
18 HAYENGA Gary M. 4% 19% 36% 29% 10% 1%
19 CHITU Julian S. 8% 35% 38% 17% 3% -
20 WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew 2% 12% 32% 36% 17% 1%
21 MAHDI Mahdi 2% 25% 46% 24% 3%
22 PETREE Justin 5% 31% 40% 20% 4% -
23 FREEMAN Paris 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% -
24 WHITE-ROY Nolan 6% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1%
25 RYAN Connor Q. 3% 18% 36% 30% 12% 2%
26 SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. 1% 9% 29% 38% 20% 3%
27 GU Jeffrey 1% 16% 43% 35% 6%
28 ROAT Kyle A. 16% 38% 32% 12% 2% -
29 ANEZ Daniel A. 5% 24% 39% 25% 6% -
30 HARDMAN III Harry C. 40% 43% 15% 2% - -
31 KARAUSKY Joshua C. 39% 42% 16% 3% - -
31 GHAZALI Omer 48% 38% 12% 2% - -
33 HAINES Ethan 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
34 JUSCINSKI Michal 17% 45% 30% 7% 1% -
35 BLACKLEDGE Michael 81% 17% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.