Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | TAQI Ahmad F. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 2 | PEDERSEN Trevor | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | ROMANOV Michael | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 3 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 5 | CANNON Caiden | - | - | 7% | 35% | 58% | |
| 6 | SPEVAK Alexander | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 7 | BRATTON Jack S. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 8 | BARLETTA Joseph | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 9 | HERGAN Daniel | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | PITCHER Skylar L. | 2% | 27% | 45% | 23% | 3% | |
| 11 | ANDERSON David C. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 2% |
| 12 | HAY Gavin | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | JACOBS Tyler M. | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | LI Simon A. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | ROBINSON Keegan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | WATERS Will T. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 18 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | CHITU Julian S. | 8% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 20 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 1% |
| 21 | MAHDI Mahdi | 2% | 25% | 46% | 24% | 3% | |
| 22 | PETREE Justin | 5% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 23 | FREEMAN Paris | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 24 | WHITE-ROY Nolan | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | RYAN Connor Q. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | GU Jeffrey | 1% | 16% | 43% | 35% | 6% | |
| 28 | ROAT Kyle A. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 29 | ANEZ Daniel A. | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 30 | HARDMAN III Harry C. | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | KARAUSKY Joshua C. | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | GHAZALI Omer | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | HAINES Ethan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 34 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 17% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.