Valley Forge Event Center - King of Prussia, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 2 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 2% | 18% | 46% | 34% | |
| 3 | SHENG Chuxi | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 5 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% | |
| 6 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 8 | SHIM Grace | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 11% |
| 10 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | - | 3% | 26% | 48% | 22% | |
| 11 | CHOW Annabelle | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 49% | 15% |
| 12 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 13 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 9% | 41% | 39% | 10% | |
| 16 | JIANG Claire | 2% | 25% | 49% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 17 | YANG Iris | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 45% | 11% | |
| 18 | WEI Angela | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 19 | CHARALEL Jessica | - | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | WANG Sabrina | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | RICHARD Clara | 3% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | RICHARD Dominique | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | 2% | 19% | 46% | 28% | 4% | |
| 24 | PAULUS Isabella | 6% | 45% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | LI Eleanor | 19% | 56% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
| 26 | LEE emily | 1% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | < 1% | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 28 | YANG Lingting | - | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | SMIDA Julia | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 30 | DALBERG Meadow | 62% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | LEVY Avery | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | PAULUS Sloane | 2% | 23% | 54% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | YU Jane | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 34 | LIN Victoria T. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 35 | STENGER Julia | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 36 | NEUMAN Sophie | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Long | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | GAZTANAGA Ana | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | SNYDERS Evelyn | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | HIMMEL Alexandra | 57% | 38% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.