Event Preview

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Cascade Clash SYCSunday, August 25, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Back to tournament Register
Northwest Fencing Center · Tigard, OR
64 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2454 2528 - 2420
5 - 8 2326 2413 - 2284
9 - 16 2097 2191 - 2000
17 - 32 1911 2112 - 1797
33 - 64 1556 1872 - 1050

Registrations
1 Lee, Jaden Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2528 2270.51
2 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 2441 2186.94
3 Bedworth, Alistair Northwest Fencing Center U 2426 2169.36
4 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center D24 2420 2163.05
5 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing U 2413 2160.15
6 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2310 2058.11
7 Lee, Abin LA International Fencing U 2295 2042.75
8 Fukuda, Brando Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 2284 2036.36
9 Oh, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2191 1936.22
10 Yang, Charles Silicon Valley Fencing Center D23 2181 1927.51
11 Tao, Jiemi Unattached U 2186 1908.64
12 Evans, Desmond Marin Fencing Academy LLC U 2112 1855.79
13 You, Alan Edmonton Fencing Club D24 2064 1804.04
14 Yee, Colin Prime Fencing Academy U 2023 1769.51
15 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 2017 1765.45
16 Ho, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2000 1747.79
17 YE, Jerry LA International Fencing U 1993 1742.33
18 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) Unattached U 2112 1736.75
19 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center E24 1980 1730.00
20 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1981 1724.89
21 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1944 1691.89
22 Yu, Eric Edmonton Fencing Club U 2072 1685.15
23 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1927 1675.59
24 wang, sicheng Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1914 1658.40
25 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1871 1621.16
26 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 1853 1598.08
27 Park, Avan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1848 1595.07
28 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1839 1591.35
29 He, Ian Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1810 1557.92
30 RYU, GREYSON Rain City Fencing Center U 1817 1552.06
31 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1797 1545.45
32 Chen, Ryker Bay Area Fencing Club U 1818 1533.73
33 Chen, Kyle Unattached U 1844 1527.03
34 Ding, Sam Bay Area Fencing Club U 1793 1526.93
35 Li, Yunze Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1771 1513.32
36 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1747 1497.27
37 Cremel, Remi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1744 1488.03
38 Yu, Jinyuan Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1728 1465.89
39 Savage, Angus Northwest Fencing Center U 1781 1447.98
40 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1721 1440.45
41 Kuang, Vincent Northwest Fencing Center U 1692 1430.51
42 Li, Ryan Edmonton Fencing Club U 1872 1424.92
43 Zheng, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1671 1400.37
44 Li, Andrew Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy U 1640 1383.24
45 Chang, Austin Camas Fencing Academy U 1666 1370.12
46 Lee, Conrad Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1637 1333.54
47 Cui, Max Rain City Fencing Center U 1716 1319.53
48 Chen, Kurtis Unattached U 1618 1319.15
49 Roberts, Nikolai Northwest Fencing Center U 1642 1305.78
50 Lin, Conrad Rain City Fencing Center U 1612 1300.69
51 Li, Lief Bay Area Fencing Club U 1540 1283.64
52 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1453 1184.11
53 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1464 1172.39
54 Qiu, Yiran Northwest Fencing Center U 1415 1135.30
55 Lam, Lazarus Unattached U 1457 1124.51
56 Wong, Connor Prime Fencing Academy U 1411 1072.45
57 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1371 1063.84
58 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1371 1063.84
59 Chong, Tanner Unattached U 1455 1049.61
60 Li, Alex Rain City Fencing Center U 1353 1027.92
61 Zhang, Derek Northwest Fencing Center U 1377 949.19
62 Li, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1080 756.18
63 Ma, Madrid Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1110 714.59
64 Ramirez, Nicanor Northwest Fencing Center U 1050 249.24

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.