Event Preview

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Cascade Clash SYCSunday, August 25, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Back to tournament Register
Northwest Fencing Center · Tigard, OR
64 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2414 2420 - 2407
5 - 8 2282 2379 - 2235
9 - 16 2112 2198 - 2015
17 - 32 1910 2112 - 1795
33 - 64 1555 1872 - 1050

Registrations
1 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing U 2420 2165.52
2 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center D24 2416 2158.96
3 Lee, Jaden Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2415 2153.13
4 Bedworth, Alistair Northwest Fencing Center U 2407 2150.08
5 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 2379 2127.22
6 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2280 2029.72
7 Lee, Abin LA International Fencing U 2235 1986.41
8 Fukuda, Brando Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 2235 1983.44
9 Oh, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2194 1939.38
10 Yang, Charles Silicon Valley Fencing Center D23 2188 1937.08
11 Tao, Jiemi Unattached U 2198 1905.64
12 Evans, Desmond Marin Fencing Academy LLC U 2126 1869.67
13 You, Alan Edmonton Fencing Club D24 2090 1826.93
14 Yee, Colin Prime Fencing Academy U 2067 1812.38
15 Ho, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2020 1767.67
16 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 2015 1760.26
17 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center E24 1993 1743.41
18 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) Unattached U 2112 1736.75
19 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1957 1697.05
20 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1941 1689.07
21 YE, Jerry LA International Fencing U 1936 1685.34
22 Yu, Eric Edmonton Fencing Club U 2072 1685.15
23 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1926 1674.54
24 Park, Avan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1894 1639.75
25 wang, sicheng Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1892 1635.74
26 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1868 1617.12
27 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 1873 1616.95
28 He, Ian Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1845 1591.86
29 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1842 1591.32
30 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1795 1541.67
31 Chen, Ryker Bay Area Fencing Club U 1818 1533.73
32 RYU, GREYSON Rain City Fencing Center U 1800 1528.71
33 Chen, Kyle Unattached U 1848 1528.01
34 Ding, Sam Bay Area Fencing Club U 1790 1519.56
35 Li, Yunze Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1762 1500.01
36 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1747 1496.97
37 Yu, Jinyuan Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1732 1468.94
38 Cremel, Remi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1724 1468.09
39 Kuang, Vincent Northwest Fencing Center U 1718 1455.36
40 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1721 1440.38
41 Savage, Angus Northwest Fencing Center U 1774 1435.83
42 Li, Ryan Edmonton Fencing Club U 1872 1424.92
43 Li, Andrew Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy U 1660 1399.55
44 Zheng, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1673 1398.17
45 Lee, Conrad Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1637 1333.54
46 Lin, Conrad Rain City Fencing Center U 1639 1322.77
47 Cui, Max Rain City Fencing Center U 1716 1319.53
48 Chang, Austin Camas Fencing Academy U 1618 1315.59
49 Roberts, Nikolai Northwest Fencing Center U 1642 1305.78
50 Chen, Kurtis Unattached U 1597 1293.54
51 Li, Lief Bay Area Fencing Club U 1486 1226.72
52 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1475 1181.39
53 Lam, Lazarus Unattached U 1473 1137.89
54 Qiu, Yiran Northwest Fencing Center U 1416 1131.39
55 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1365 1086.87
56 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1400 1084.12
57 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1400 1084.12
58 Wong, Connor Prime Fencing Academy U 1411 1072.45
59 Chong, Tanner Unattached U 1455 1049.61
60 Li, Alex Rain City Fencing Center U 1348 1019.27
61 Zhang, Derek Northwest Fencing Center U 1393 960.26
62 Li, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1095 769.23
63 Ma, Madrid Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1124 724.36
64 Ramirez, Nicanor Northwest Fencing Center U 1050 249.24

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.