Event Preview

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Cascade Clash SYCSunday, August 25, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Back to tournament Register
Northwest Fencing Center · Tigard, OR
64 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2418 2446 - 2395
5 - 8 2271 2348 - 2217
9 - 16 2112 2198 - 2013
17 - 32 1917 2112 - 1816
33 - 64 1552 1872 - 1050

Registrations
1 Lee, Jaden Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2446 2182.64
2 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing U 2428 2175.36
3 Bedworth, Alistair Northwest Fencing Center U 2401 2142.58
4 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center D24 2395 2139.99
5 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 2348 2097.20
6 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2294 2042.97
7 Fukuda, Brando Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 2225 1972.89
8 Lee, Abin LA International Fencing U 2217 1967.10
9 Oh, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2196 1941.48
10 Yang, Charles Silicon Valley Fencing Center D23 2177 1924.42
11 Tao, Jiemi Unattached U 2198 1905.63
12 Evans, Desmond Marin Fencing Academy LLC U 2126 1869.67
13 You, Alan Edmonton Fencing Club D24 2090 1826.93
14 Yee, Colin Prime Fencing Academy U 2078 1822.75
15 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center E24 2022 1772.56
16 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 2013 1757.15
17 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) Unattached U 2112 1736.75
18 Ho, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 1982 1727.13
19 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1969 1709.37
20 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1954 1701.79
21 Yu, Eric Edmonton Fencing Club U 2072 1685.15
22 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1929 1677.07
23 YE, Jerry LA International Fencing U 1915 1662.37
24 Park, Avan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1904 1649.80
25 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 1901 1644.47
26 wang, sicheng Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1890 1633.07
27 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1869 1617.26
28 He, Ian Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1852 1598.53
29 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1816 1565.63
30 RYU, GREYSON Rain City Fencing Center U 1834 1560.29
31 Chen, Ryker Bay Area Fencing Club U 1818 1533.73
32 Chen, Kyle Unattached U 1848 1528.01
33 Ding, Sam Bay Area Fencing Club U 1790 1519.56
34 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1755 1500.31
35 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1747 1496.95
36 Li, Yunze Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1743 1477.59
37 Cremel, Remi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1731 1474.64
38 Kuang, Vincent Northwest Fencing Center U 1737 1471.65
39 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1748 1465.35
40 Savage, Angus Northwest Fencing Center U 1789 1444.17
41 Li, Ryan Edmonton Fencing Club U 1872 1424.92
42 Yu, Jinyuan Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1689 1423.47
43 Zheng, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1697 1419.48
44 Li, Andrew Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy U 1601 1335.02
45 Lee, Conrad Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1637 1333.54
46 Lin, Conrad Rain City Fencing Center U 1653 1332.89
47 Roberts, Nikolai Northwest Fencing Center U 1665 1325.51
48 Cui, Max Rain City Fencing Center U 1716 1319.53
49 Chen, Kurtis Unattached U 1597 1293.54
50 Chang, Austin Camas Fencing Academy U 1594 1278.81
51 Li, Lief Bay Area Fencing Club U 1486 1226.72
52 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1480 1185.89
53 Lam, Lazarus Unattached U 1473 1137.89
54 Qiu, Yiran Northwest Fencing Center U 1385 1093.07
55 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1401 1081.96
56 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1401 1081.96
57 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1358 1080.33
58 Wong, Connor Prime Fencing Academy U 1411 1072.45
59 Chong, Tanner Unattached U 1455 1049.61
60 Li, Alex Rain City Fencing Center U 1367 1036.20
61 Zhang, Derek Northwest Fencing Center U 1373 932.19
62 Li, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1127 797.00
63 Ma, Madrid Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1124 724.36
64 Ramirez, Nicanor Northwest Fencing Center U 1050 249.24

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.