Event Preview

Youth 12 Men’s Foil (Y12MF)

Cascade Clash SYCSunday, August 25, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Back to tournament Register
Northwest Fencing Center · Tigard, OR
64 approved entrants 5 strength bands

Strength distribution

Finish Range Average Range
1 - 4 2435 2487 - 2412
5 - 8 2314 2397 - 2250
9 - 16 2108 2198 - 2017
17 - 32 1912 2112 - 1801
33 - 64 1555 1872 - 1050

Registrations
1 Lee, Jaden Golubitsky Fencing Center U 2487 2225.40
2 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) LA International Fencing U 2420 2166.65
3 Bedworth, Alistair Northwest Fencing Center U 2421 2163.79
4 Park, Andrew Silicon Valley Fencing Center D24 2412 2155.09
5 Zhou, Shawn LA International Fencing U 2397 2143.35
6 Pan, Ethan Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. D24 2308 2054.73
7 Lee, Abin LA International Fencing U 2303 2052.08
8 Fukuda, Brando Massialas Foundation (M Team) E24 2250 1999.92
9 Yang, Charles Silicon Valley Fencing Center D23 2195 1943.73
10 Oh, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2198 1942.38
11 Tao, Jiemi Unattached U 2192 1910.37
12 Evans, Desmond Marin Fencing Academy LLC U 2106 1850.12
13 You, Alan Edmonton Fencing Club D24 2092 1828.96
14 Yee, Colin Prime Fencing Academy U 2041 1786.69
15 Ganapathi, Eshan Prime Fencing Academy U 2026 1773.28
16 Ho, Christopher Rain City Fencing Center U 2017 1765.32
17 Yang, Tate Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1998 1739.81
18 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) Unattached U 2112 1736.75
19 Rau, Shogun Silicon Valley Fencing Center E24 1980 1729.84
20 YE, Jerry LA International Fencing U 1973 1721.31
21 Hong, Edwin Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1939 1687.40
22 Yu, Eric Edmonton Fencing Club U 2072 1685.15
23 Yang, Steve Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1918 1666.60
24 wang, sicheng Golubitsky Fencing Center U 1887 1631.47
25 Xu, Ethan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1872 1621.36
26 Park, Avan Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1872 1619.21
27 Peskin, Kepler Northwest Fencing Center U 1852 1597.22
28 Slain, Owen Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1839 1590.40
29 He, Ian Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1809 1557.05
30 Murdock, Koichi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1801 1549.72
31 Chen, Ryker Bay Area Fencing Club U 1818 1533.73
32 Chen, Kyle Unattached U 1844 1527.03
33 RYU, GREYSON Rain City Fencing Center U 1788 1518.04
34 Alvarez, Francisco Janusz Maximum Fencing Club U 1765 1514.21
35 Li, Yunze Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1773 1514.21
36 Ding, Sam Bay Area Fencing Club U 1769 1500.14
37 Cremel, Remi Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1748 1492.03
38 Yu, Jinyuan Massialas Foundation (M Team) U 1728 1465.89
39 Savage, Angus Northwest Fencing Center U 1783 1448.56
40 Kuang, Vincent Northwest Fencing Center U 1706 1444.09
41 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1721 1440.38
42 Li, Ryan Edmonton Fencing Club U 1872 1424.92
43 Li, Andrew Fairfield County Fencing Academy AKA Fairfield Fencing Academy U 1665 1407.07
44 Zheng, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1663 1389.25
45 Lee, Conrad Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1637 1333.54
46 Chang, Austin Camas Fencing Academy U 1626 1325.00
47 Cui, Max Rain City Fencing Center U 1716 1319.53
48 Chen, Kurtis Unattached U 1618 1319.15
49 Lin, Conrad Rain City Fencing Center U 1631 1316.67
50 Roberts, Nikolai Northwest Fencing Center U 1642 1305.78
51 Li, Lief Bay Area Fencing Club U 1536 1277.87
52 He, Gary Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1464 1172.39
53 Yan, Aaron Silicon Valley Fencing Center U 1425 1154.17
54 Qiu, Yiran Northwest Fencing Center U 1407 1124.83
55 Lam, Lazarus Unattached U 1457 1124.51
56 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1385 1072.55
57 Lin, Alden Northwest Fencing Center U 1385 1072.55
58 Wong, Connor Prime Fencing Academy U 1411 1072.45
59 Chong, Tanner Unattached U 1455 1049.61
60 Li, Alex Rain City Fencing Center U 1348 1019.27
61 Zhang, Derek Northwest Fencing Center U 1377 949.19
62 Li, Jonathan Rain City Fencing Center U 1095 769.23
63 Ma, Madrid Dynamo Fencing Center Inc. U 1124 724.36
64 Ramirez, Nicanor Northwest Fencing Center U 1050 249.24

Rank is based on the conservative estimate, `mu - 3*sigma`, rather than raw strength alone. Newer or less-certain fencers can still appear lower than someone with a similar average but tighter confidence.