Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
| 2 | KANG evan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 3 | YAN William | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 3 | SAHAY Kenji | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 41% | |
| 5 | LIN Maxim | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 6 | DOWNEY Baran | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 7 | WANG daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 8 | TANG Shu Hon | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 9 | GONG Jerry | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 18% |
| 10 | LIU Kevin | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 11 | ALAVE Kyle | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 12 | KAZIMIR Harrison | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | VAROQUA Nalby | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% | |
| 15 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 1% | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 16 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 17 | LEE Ashe | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 18 | KUMAR Arjun | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 19 | DESFORGES Jacques | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | KIM Theodore | 13% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | BUCK Maximilian | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 22 | BIVIJI Ali | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 23 | LIM Brandon | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 24 | ZHAO Eric | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | SHAH Sajan | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BADUSHOV Anton | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 27 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | |
| 29 | HO Nathaniel | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | ORAL Derin | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | JONES Elijah | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 32 | BODKIN Jake M. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 33 | SHAH Sohan | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 5% | |
| 34 | YANG Richard Yunzheng | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 35 | KAY Gabriel | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 36 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Emmanuel | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WONG Caleb W. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHEA Caden | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | CHEN Ryan | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 41 | YANG Si He | 7% | 35% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | FEENEY Michael | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | HARRIS Evan | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.