Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
2 | KANG evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
3 | YAN William | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
3 | SAHAY Kenji | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
5 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
6 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
7 | WANG daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
8 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% | |
9 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
10 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
11 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
12 | KAZIMIR Harrison | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
13 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
14 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% | |
15 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | |
16 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 99% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
17 | LEE Ashe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | |
18 | KUMAR Arjun | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
19 | DESFORGES Jacques | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 87% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
21 | BUCK Maximilian | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
22 | BIVIJI Ali | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
23 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
24 | ZHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
25 | SHAH Sajan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
26 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
27 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
28 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
29 | HO Nathaniel | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | |
30 | ORAL Derin | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
31 | JONES Elijah | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
32 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
33 | SHAH Sohan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 5% | |
34 | YANG Richard Yunzheng | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
35 | KAY Gabriel | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | SHINCHUK Jacob | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | ZHANG Emmanuel | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
38 | AYDOGDU Hakan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
40 | CHEA Caden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | YANG Si He | 100% | 93% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | |
43 | FEENEY Michael | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
44 | HARRIS Evan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.