Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KANG evan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 2 | SAVOY Luca | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 58% | |
| 3 | WILSON Jude | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% | |
| 5 | HUANG Connor | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% |
| 6 | WOODWARD Connor | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% | |
| 7 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 8 | NG Jeremiah | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 29% | |
| 9 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 10 | BODKIN Jake M. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 11 | GONG Jerry | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 12 | LIU Kevin | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | GINSBERG jordan | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 14 | LIN Maxim | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 15 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | WANG daniel | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEDERMAN James | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 18 | ZHAO Eric | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | LEE Ashe | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 21 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 22 | MENDOZA Luca | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | VAROQUA Nalby | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZHOU Grant | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | LEE Andrew | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 27 | ALAVE Kyle | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | ONG Chinli | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DIMATTEO Michael | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | TANG Shu Hon | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | XIA Eric | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KUMAR Arjun | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | YAN William | 1% | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 35 | YANG Richard Yunzheng | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LONKER Zachary | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TIAGI Daniel | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 38 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | HARUTYUNYAN Gevorg | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | - | |
| 40 | DRUZHININ Michael | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JIN David | 9% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | MAMKIN Nathan | 7% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | WHEELER Jackson | 58% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.