Cobra Fencing Club - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KANG evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 2 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
| 3 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% | |
| 3 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | |
| 5 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | |
| 7 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | |
| 8 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
| 9 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 10 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 11 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 12 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | GINSBERG jordan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% | |
| 14 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 15 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 16 | WANG daniel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEDERMAN James | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 18 | ZHAO Eric | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | LEE Ashe | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 19 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | KUSHKOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 22 | MENDOZA Luca | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 24 | ZHOU Grant | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | ALAVE Kyle | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 2% | |
| 28 | ONG Chinli | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 32 | XIA Eric | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | KUMAR Arjun | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | YAN William | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 35 | YANG Richard Yunzheng | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | LONKER Zachary | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | TIAGI Daniel | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | HARUTYUNYAN Gevorg | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 40 | DRUZHININ Michael | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | JIN David | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | MAMKIN Nathan | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | WHEELER Jackson | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.