Remenyik ROC and RJCC

Junior Women’s Epee (JNRWE)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Register

Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3150 3326 - 2865
5 - 8 2665 2812 - 2455
9 - 16 2188 2424 - 1904
17 - 27 1694 1971 - 1086

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wade-Currie, Ava Northwestern University NCAA A24 3326 3061.24
2 Ning, Emma Northwestern University NCAA A22 3263 2973.37
3 Liu, Christina Northwestern University NCAA A23 3148 2887.07
4 Beckman, Ana Windy City Fencing-Chicago A23 2865 2605.18
5 Swenson, Nikita Ataba Fencing Club B24 2812 2553.48
6 Xiong, Angelica Twin Cities Fencing Club B24 2781 2499.90
7 Franger, Macy Escrime Du Lac B24 2611 2343.61
8 Sun, Zeyu B24 2455 2194.39
9 Liang, Jingjing Academy Of Fencing Masters (AFM) B24 2424 2170.38
10 Iyer, Ishana Fencing Center Of Chicago B24 2330 2071.51
11 Zhao, Alina Windy City Fencing-Chicago A24 2332 2049.39
12 Ma, Sophie D24 2253 1969.51
13 mallavarpu, saanvi Illinois Fencing Academy B23 2244 1963.08
14 Stern, Savannah Windy City Fencing-Chicago C24 2072 1782.02
15 Elterman, Kate Windy City Fencing-Chicago C24 1944 1669.78
16 Nelson, Grace Escrime Du Lac C24 1904 1621.96
17 Aneziokoro, Zahra Windy City Fencing-Chicago C24 1895 1576.09
18 Chuang, Ramona Fencing Center Of Chicago C23 1846 1561.94
19 Varan, Kateryna Windy City Fencing-Chicago C23 1874 1524.91
20 jorgensen, Kjirsten Twin Cities Fencing Club E24 1857 1364.64
21 Bukowski, Lillian Twin Cities Fencing Club E24 1971 1292.99
22 Aldort, Isabel U 1861 1271.72
23 Tang, Elaine Windy City Fencing-Chicago D23 1690 1269.12
24 McKenna, Analise Escrime Du Lac E22 1521 1184.25
25 Tang, Ellen Windy City Fencing-Chicago E24 1496 1020.64
26 Hull, Ilsa Ataba Fencing Club E24 1540 987.21
27 Culver, Hannah Center for Blade Arts U 1086 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!