Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | - | 7% | 37% | 56% |
| 2 | HU Michelle | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 3 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 5 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 6 | LEE Lauren | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 4% |
| 7 | DANG Kelia | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% | |
| 8 | YAM Danika | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 9 | HUANG Rachael | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 9% |
| 10 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 11 | CHO Michelle | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 12 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
| 13 | NGUYEN Siena | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 30% | |
| 14 | CHEN Elaine | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 15 | STONE Coral | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | LO Chloe | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 31% | 6% | |
| 17 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 18 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 19 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 30% | 5% |
| 19 | YAO Rainie | - | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 21 | FENG Alicia G. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 22 | ZHAI AMY | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | WANG Zidan | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 23 | CHAN Jolene | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% |
| 25 | HUAI Delilah | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 26 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 27 | ZOLLER Noelle | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 28 | LOMOTAN Addison | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 29 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KINKADE Ellie | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JENSEN Katrina | 76% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | LIU Sydney | - | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% |
| 34 | KIM Elyssa | 4% | 27% | 47% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 6% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | STEPHENS Samora | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 39 | SHEARER Alena | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | BAO Jingxuan | 14% | 48% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 41 | ARNOLD Hali | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 42 | WANG Peijia | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SCHOEW Margot | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 44 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 46 | DUDNICK Morgan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | GOMES Diana C. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 47 | BAIRD Kaleah | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | XA-CHIN Sara | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | WANG Jiayi | 3% | 34% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | MUNGUIA Mila | 5% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LEE Madeleine | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SOEHARTONO Jessica | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 54 | SAAD Alia | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | RAHNAMA Lida | 1% | 11% | 36% | 38% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 56 | POIRIER Hailey | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | HAN Emma | 8% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | VILLARAMA Kara | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 59 | FITZER Katharine | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | ZHANG Emily | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | LYMAN Lily | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.