Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSE Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% |
| 2 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
| 3 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 3 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 5 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
| 6 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 7 | DANG Kelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 8 | YAM Danika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
| 9 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 9% |
| 10 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 11 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 12 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | |
| 13 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 14 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 15 | STONE Coral | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | LO Chloe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% | 6% | |
| 17 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 18 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
| 19 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 5% |
| 19 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
| 22 | ZHAI AMY | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 23 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
| 23 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% |
| 25 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 26 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 29 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 31 | KORINTH Jacqueline | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JENSEN Katrina | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
| 34 | KIM Elyssa | 100% | 96% | 69% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 36 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | STEPHENS Samora | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 39 | BAO Jingxuan | 100% | 86% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
| 41 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 42 | WANG Peijia | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 44 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 46 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 47 | BAIRD Kaleah | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 49 | XA-CHIN Sara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 50 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 97% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 95% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LEE Madeleine | 100% | 74% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | SOEHARTONO Jessica | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 54 | SAAD Alia | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | RAHNAMA Lida | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 56 | POIRIER Hailey | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | HAN Emma | 100% | 92% | 59% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | VILLARAMA Kara | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 59 | FITZER Katharine | 100% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | LYMAN Lily | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.