GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER - College Park, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KROPP Jack | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
2 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
3 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
3 | TREBON Hayden | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
5 | WEI HUNTER | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
6 | ARANA Abraham | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
7 | SCHARF Ryan | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
8 | JAAFAR Omar | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
9 | CLICK Aiden | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
10 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
11 | CHO Tyler H. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
12 | MOON Ryan Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
13 | WANG Tristan | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
14 | BERKOWITZ Jeffrey | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
15 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
16 | JAAFAR Hamza | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
17 | DAVIS Jonah | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
18 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | 11% | 38% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
19 | JEON Hwidong | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | FANG Hanning | 7% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
21 | JONES Tyler | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
22 | MERRITT Frederick Ross | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
23 | PAN Tristan | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
24 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
25 | MODULLA Yathin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
26 | JUNG Joshua | 25% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | O'CONNOR Riley | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
28 | HU Robert J. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
28 | MARIN Lucas | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | NICKERSON Oliver | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.