GEORGIA INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTER - College Park, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SIMMES Jackson | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
2 | MODANLOU Navid | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
3 | CORBIN Bennett | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
3 | MOORE Alexander | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
5 | ZAHRAN Aiden | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
6 | OSBORN Hunter | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
7 | CARTY JR Johndale | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
8 | GONZALEZ Aaron M | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
9 | BANSAL Arjun | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 6% |
10 | AYOTTE James | 1% | 10% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
11 | POSADA Maximo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
12 | CHA Patrick | 4% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
13 | TWEMLOW Sacha | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | VOLKOV Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
15 | JIANG Harry | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
16 | KROPP Wesley | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | LIDSKY Phineas | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
18 | NAM Nathaniel | 5% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
19 | KIM Julian | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
20 | LEE Christopher | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
21 | KANG Roy | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
22 | FONG Henry | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | GONZALEZ Gavin | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
23 | KRAYEV Lev | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
25 | GEURTSEN Henry | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
26 | ZENG Albert | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
27 | CHANG Matthew | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.