SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DU Hannah | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 2 | XIANG Emma | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 25% | |
| 3 | MING YUE | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 3 | YANG Lingting | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 5 | RASO Olivia | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% | |
| 6 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 29% | 5% | |
| 7 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 8 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 3% | 20% | 48% | 29% | |
| 9 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | FU Qihan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 11 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 12 | TAN Clarisse | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 13 | HUANG NATALIE | - | - | 2% | 19% | 47% | 31% | |
| 14 | LENZ Zoe N. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 15 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | NEWMAN Ariel | 2% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | BHAN Zala | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
| 19 | CHARALEL Jessica | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 20 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 21 | CHEN Jasmine | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 22 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | MENON Rhea | 17% | 44% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 24 | GANDLURI Sreehitha (Sarah) | 13% | 41% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | ROHRING Anna | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | ZGOMBIC Emily | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | NEUMAN Sophie | 1% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | SCARLETT Skye | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | DENYSIUK Sumajja | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | DIPAOLO Julia | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HERMES Kathleen A. | < 1% | 1% | 9% | 35% | 42% | 12% | |
| 32 | CHENG Isa | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 33 | LIU Lucy | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | PAULUS Isabella | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 35 | WANG Sophie | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | VELLORE Angelica | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 37 | BAUER Anna | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | TAN Junqi | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.