SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% | ||
| 2 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 79% |
| 3 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 11% | |
| 3 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 5 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 47% | 28% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 7 | NEWHARD Zelia "Zizi" | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 8 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% | |
| 9 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 1% |
| 10 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | 3% | 22% | 49% | 26% | ||
| 12 | LEE Lavender | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 25% | 2% |
| 13 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 14 | FU Qihan | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 15 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Julie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 36% | 4% |
| 18 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 2% |
| 19 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 16% | |
| 20 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 1% | 15% | 48% | 31% | 5% | ||
| 21 | SHIM Grace | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 22 | ROY Layla | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | RASO Olivia | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | XIANG Emma | - | 7% | 38% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
| 25 | GU Emily | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 26 | ZHOU Catherine | 1% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 4% | 27% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 28 | LIU Sophia | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | YANG Lingting | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 16% | 55% | 25% | 4% | - | ||
| 31 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 16% | 46% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | PAULUS Sloane | 66% | 31% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 33 | BHAN Zala | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 34 | DENYSIUK Sumajja | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | UNGERER Frieda | 4% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | HUNT Abigail S. | 3% | 62% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | LENZ Zoe N. | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | NEWMAN Ariel | 5% | 33% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | GAO Anne | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | SCARLETT Skye | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | MAESTRADO Ashley R. | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | CHENG Isa | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 43 | SA Milla | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | BAUER Anna | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.