Southwest Recreation Center - gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUDOLPH Max | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% |
| 2 | FELIX Ian | 3% | 30% | 67% | ||||
| 3 | DONDERIS Hannah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | ALONSO Vinicius | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 5 | LORENZO Alejandro | - | 5% | 29% | 47% | 19% | ||
| 6 | CAMPBELL Justin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 5% |
| 7 | VIVEROS Antonio | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 8 | BRACELIS Josias | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 53% | 35% |
| 9 | REYES Manuel | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 10 | STORER Alex | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
| 11 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 31% | 3% | |
| 13 | PROVATAS Eustratios | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 14 | MONSALVE Ainara | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% |
| 16 | JITTAN Daniel | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 17 | SAADO Cesar | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 18 | WEBB Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 19 | PACILIO Jacob | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | FAGEN Chase | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 21 | TANT Kenneth | - | - | - | 6% | 45% | 48% | |
| 22 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 35% | ||
| 23 | WATERS Samantha | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | YIM Rachael | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | RODRIGUEZ Beni | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 25 | WU Velyn | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | VIVEROS Oscar | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | DONDERIS Katherine | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 29 | GONZALEZ QUIMBAY Yoselin | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 30 | CUNANAN Ethan | 10% | 35% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | SAMUEL Paul | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ANAND Aayush | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | CASEY Pierce | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | GARIBAY Lia | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HELTEBRIDLE Genevieve | 58% | 37% | 4% | ||||
| 36 | IRVIN Ethan | 16% | 50% | 28% | 5% | - | ||
| 37 | CHEN Zixuan | 53% | 39% | 8% | - | - | ||
| 38 | FLYNN Michael | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 39 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 8% | 39% | 47% | 7% | - | - | |
| 40 | SUNDOWN Shaune-Anthony | 2% | 16% | 41% | 33% | 8% | ||
| 42 | WEDDLE Carson | - | 7% | 34% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 43 | KIM Chaevin | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 44 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper | 5% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | CHOWDHURY Arman | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | PICKENS Grace | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | MILLER Jonathan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | MCQUEEN Mikell | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 49 | URIBE LEON Sebastian | 25% | 59% | 15% | ||||
| 50 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 47% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | NAMM Emily | 4% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 52 | MATHEW Esther | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | GO AJ | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | FARHAT Preston | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | THOMAS Truly A. | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | BIWANG Aeron | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 57 | TORNEY Genevieve | 11% | 40% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | JORDAN Christopher | 8% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 59 | LAKHEERAM Kyla | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | VICTOR Maya | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 62 | PENNER Charlie | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | RANDAZZO Nurin | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | MORENO Mariapaz | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 65 | DEANGELIS Skylar | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.