Southwest Recreation Center - gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RUDOLPH Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% |
2 | FELIX Ian | 100% | 97% | 67% | ||||
3 | DONDERIS Hannah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
3 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% |
5 | LORENZO Alejandro | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 19% | ||
6 | CAMPBELL Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | 5% |
7 | VIVEROS Antonio | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
8 | BRACELIS Josias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 35% |
9 | REYES Manuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
10 | STORER Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 5% |
11 | KANDAGADLA Rishi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 33% | 3% | |
13 | PROVATAS Eustratios | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
14 | MONSALVE Ainara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
16 | JITTAN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
17 | SAADO Cesar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
18 | WEBB Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
19 | PACILIO Jacob | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
20 | FAGEN Chase | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
21 | TANT Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 48% | |
22 | HUSSAIN Mustafa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | ||
23 | WATERS Samantha | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
24 | YIM Rachael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% | 1% |
25 | RODRIGUEZ Beni | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
25 | WU Velyn | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
27 | VIVEROS Oscar | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
28 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
29 | GONZALEZ QUIMBAY Yoselin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
30 | CUNANAN Ethan | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
31 | SAMUEL Paul | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | ANAND Aayush | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
33 | CASEY Pierce | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
34 | GARIBAY Lia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - |
35 | HELTEBRIDLE Genevieve | 100% | 42% | 4% | ||||
36 | IRVIN Ethan | 100% | 84% | 33% | 6% | - | ||
37 | CHEN Zixuan | 100% | 47% | 8% | - | - | ||
38 | FLYNN Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | |
39 | GADIYARAM Madhav | 100% | 92% | 54% | 7% | - | - | |
40 | SUNDOWN Shaune-Anthony | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% | ||
42 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - |
43 | KIM Chaevin | 100% | 98% | 78% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
44 | BUTFILOSKI Cooper | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
44 | CHOWDHURY Arman | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
46 | PICKENS Grace | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
47 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
48 | MCQUEEN Mikell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 3% |
49 | URIBE LEON Sebastian | 100% | 75% | 15% | ||||
50 | WOEHRMAN Madeline | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
51 | NAMM Emily | 100% | 96% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - | |
52 | MATHEW Esther | 100% | 84% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
53 | GO AJ | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
54 | FARHAT Preston | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
55 | THOMAS Truly A. | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
55 | BIWANG Aeron | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
57 | TORNEY Genevieve | 100% | 89% | 49% | 9% | 1% | - | |
58 | JORDAN Christopher | 100% | 92% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
59 | LAKHEERAM Kyla | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
60 | VICTOR Maya | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
62 | PENNER Charlie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
64 | RANDAZZO Nurin | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
65 | MORENO Mariapaz | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
65 | DEANGELIS Skylar | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.