Southwest Recreation Center - gainesville, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 55% | |
| 2 | DULISSE ALeX | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
| 3 | WEBB Jacob T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 37% |
| 3 | LANGENDERFER Braeden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 28% | |
| 5 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 6 | PROVATAS Eustratios | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 48% |
| 7 | RUETSCHI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 22% |
| 8 | PACILIO Jacob | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | 3% |
| 9 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 42% |
| 10 | BAKSA Frances E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 18% |
| 10 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
| 12 | IRWIN Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 13 | LEVENTHAL Michael | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 14 | BRETON Anthony | 100% | 99% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | MCFARLAND John G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 17% |
| 16 | MURRAY Kerk | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 5% |
| 18 | ANDREA Nathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 19 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
| 20 | YACCINO Nino | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 21 | WOLF Christopher | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 22 | COVERT Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 23 | MILLER Jonathan | 100% | 95% | 62% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 24 | CHO Justin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 25 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 26 | LE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | 2% |
| 26 | ROMERO KURI Celeste | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 8% | - |
| 28 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | GASPAR Paula | 100% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KOKA Ashwin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 40% | 6% | - |
| 31 | RIGGINS James | 100% | 58% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LOUIS David | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
| 33 | SANDERS Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 34 | BEREKHOVSKI Andrei | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 35 | SANCHEZ Carlos | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 11% | 1% |
| 36 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
| 37 | FREEMAN Zachary | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | 1% |
| 38 | MIHALIK Alva | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 39 | JOHNSTON Kellan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 40 | MIA Raj | 100% | 91% | 55% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HEINZE Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 42 | PETERS Micah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 43 | GOLDSON Tyrese | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 43 | RODA Thaleia | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 45 | COMER John | 100% | 70% | 18% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | GRAHAM Caleb | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% | 8% | - |
| 47 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | FORTIER Adriana | 100% | 88% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | RILEY Grace | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | BEASLEY Emma | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | LIU Nick | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 51 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | DE SOLO Elizabeth | 100% | 80% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CULLEN Reilly | 100% | 96% | 69% | 16% | 1% | |
| 55 | MCCREARY Madeleine | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 56 | KOSSMANN Raymond | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 57 | ROZET Alice | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | LEWIS Katherine | 100% | 88% | 35% | 5% | - | - |
| 59 | RASSEL John | 100% | 88% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | TANGUAY Brooke | 100% | 87% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 62 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 83% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 64 | POPOLA Genevieve | 100% | 94% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 64 | WILFORD Madigan | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | FRANCA Dillon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.