Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 2 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 3 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 7% |
| 3 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
| 5 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 6 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% | |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% | |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 9 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% | |
| 10 | BIERNACKI Maciej L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 11 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 12 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
| 15 | KIM Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | SINGH Angadh | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | ||
| 17 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 18 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 10% | |
| 19 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
| 20 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 21 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 13% | |
| 22 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | ||
| 23 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | |
| 24 | WANG Robert | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 10% | ||
| 25 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 19% | |
| 27 | SHI Erick | 100% | 80% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 28 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 29 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% | |
| 30 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | |
| 31 | CADAMBI Roshan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 32 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | ||
| 34 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 35 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 37 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 38 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 39 | OH Triton | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 40 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 92% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | VOSS Jeffer | 100% | 94% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 45 | TANG Shu Hon | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 95% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | |
| 48 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | XIA Eric | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | COPP-SALKO Max (Robert Maxwell) | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | HAQ Kamran R. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | ||
| 53 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% | |
| 55 | GILPIN Samuel | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.