Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 2 | JING Emily | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% |
| 3 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 5 | FANG Sabrina | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 6 | STAMOS Maria | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 7 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% | |
| 8 | YU Lauren C. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 10 | LINALDI Liana M. | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 47% | 24% |
| 11 | LI Rachel Y. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 12 | DAVIA Daniella V. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 34% | 8% |
| 14 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 15 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 16 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 2% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Alina C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 18 | SERBAN Samantha M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 19 | JANG Kimberley | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 20 | XUE Alanna L. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 21 | LEE Lavender | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHEN Jia P. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 23 | ROY Layla | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
| 25 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | CHEN Allison V. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 10% | |
| 27 | MILLER Naomi E. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 7% |
| 28 | CHOW Annabelle | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 30 | YANG Lingting | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 32 | ZHENG Julie | 16% | 46% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | SEO Irene Y. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SHENG Chuxi | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GU Emily | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | HUANG Natalie | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 38 | MEYER Claudia | 15% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WU Julianna Y. | - | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 41 | HSIEH Rebecca | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 46% | 10% |
| 43 | XU Christine | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | DU Hannah | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 45 | SCARLETT Skye | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 14% | 47% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | WONG Sophia M. | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | SIMONOV Dasha | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 50 | JIANG Claire | 55% | 37% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | SHMAY Anastasia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PAULUS Isabella | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SHA Yi Ling | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | WU Renee | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 56 | LIU Sophia | 45% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE Ariana | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
| 58 | HUNT Abigail S. | 63% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.