Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NOTT Adrienne (Adi) M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% |
| 2 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | |
| 3 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 29% |
| 3 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 15% | |
| 5 | FANG Sabrina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 6 | STAMOS Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% | |
| 7 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% | |
| 8 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 9 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | LINALDI Liana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% |
| 11 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 12 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 8% |
| 14 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 15 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 16 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 18 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
| 19 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 20 | XUE Alanna L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 21 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHEN Jia P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% | |
| 23 | ROY Layla | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | 1% |
| 25 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% | |
| 27 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 28 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 29 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 30 | YANG Lingting | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 31 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 32 | ZHENG Julie | 100% | 84% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | SEO Irene Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 34 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | GU Emily | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | HUANG Natalie | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | MCGILLION-MOORE Katie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 41 | HSIEH Rebecca | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 10% |
| 43 | XU Christine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | DU Hannah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 45 | SCARLETT Skye | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 86% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 49 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 50 | JIANG Claire | 100% | 45% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | SHMAY Anastasia | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SHA Yi Ling | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | WU Renee | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 56 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 57 | LEE Ariana | 100% | 98% | 80% | 36% | 7% | - | - |
| 58 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.