Durkan Fencing Academy - Garfield, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 2 | GHOSH Priyanka | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 3 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 3 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 16% |
| 5 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% |
| 6 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 7 | DANK Dina | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 8 | COLTER Aurora | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 9 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
| 10 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 11 | SPRINGER Ella | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 12 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 13 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 14 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 14% |
| 15 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
| 16 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 17 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 18 | NI Sharon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 19 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 5% |
| 19 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 21 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SHUM Cindy | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 26 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 28 | REN Xinling | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 30 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 34 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 36 | CONNOLLY Vida | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 37 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 40 | KAPLAN Gabriela | 100% | 50% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BINSTOCK Mari I. | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.