RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 2 | LIM William J. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 20% | |
| 3 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% |
| 3 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 5 | HJERPE Wade H. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% |
| 6 | JOO Jeein | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 8 | BYON Adrian | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 9 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
| 10 | RHEE Ethan N. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 11 | STONE Esmond A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 12 | CHOW William T. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LEE Noah | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | LO Konnor | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 15 | KROON Lucas | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
| 16 | LI Yiwei | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | GAO Marcus | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 18 | TAO Jeffrey | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
| 19 | NIETO Titus P. | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | CHAN Aidan | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 21 | QIU Nathan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 22 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | PASTORE LIU Vince | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | COONS Caden | 19% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | BYON Julian | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 26 | HWANG Jayden | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 27 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 5% | 28% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | BARRIOS Diego | 44% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | BRAKEY Ryan | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 30 | TUNG Ryan | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | CHEN Lohen | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KANG Evan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 33 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | YAN Kevin | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 35 | KIM Ian L. | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 6% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | YU Kevin | 18% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | - | |
| 38 | SOWERS Samuel | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | GUO Brian | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | WANG HongXi | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 41 | BURDETTE Ricky | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.