RIMAC Arena @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZUBATIY Samuel | V V V V V D | V V V V V | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 2 | LIM William J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 5 | HJERPE Wade H. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 6 | JOO Jeein | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | AVAKIAN Alec | V D V D V V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 8 | BYON Adrian | V V V D V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | BONIFIELD Arthur G. | V D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 10 | RHEE Ethan N. | V D D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 11 | STONE Esmond A. | V D V V D D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 12 | CHOW William T. | V V V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 13 | LEE Noah | V D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | LO Konnor | D V V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | KROON Lucas | V D V V D D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 16 | LI Yiwei | D D D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 17 | GAO Marcus | V V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | TAO Jeffrey | D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | NIETO Titus P. | D V V D V V | D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 19 | CHAN Aidan | V V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | QIU Nathan | V V V D V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 22 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | D V D V V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 23 | PASTORE LIU Vince | V D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | COONS Caden | D V V V D V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 25 | BYON Julian | V D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | HWANG Jayden | D D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 27 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 28 | BARRIOS Diego | D D V D D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 29 | BRAKEY Ryan | D D D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | TUNG Ryan | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | CHEN Lohen | D D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 32 | KANG Evan | D D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 33 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 34 | YAN Kevin | D D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | KIM Ian L. | D D V D D V | D | 0.4 | 2 | +1.6 |
| 36 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 37 | YU Kevin | V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | SOWERS Samuel | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 39 | GUO Brian | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 40 | WANG HongXi | D V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 41 | BURDETTE Ricky | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.