Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Allison V. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 2 | CHUSID Mikayla | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 3 | YU Lauren C. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 3 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% | |
| 5 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
| 6 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 7 | XIANG Emma | - | - | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | LIU Angel(Daying) | - | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 9 | WU Celine | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 10 | SIMONOV Dasha | - | - | 4% | 22% | 49% | 25% | |
| 11 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 12 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 6% |
| 13 | CHEN Jasmine | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | TOBIN Brean | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 15 | LEE Lavender | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 16 | CHARALEL Jessica | 1% | 15% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 18 | HUANG NATALIE | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 19 | SEO IRENE Y. | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 20 | KULKARNI Sohah A. | - | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | RASO Olivia | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
| 22 | SHMAY Anastasia | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 24 | SHA Yi Ling | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 25 | LIN Victoria T. | - | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | ROY Layla | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
| 27 | WANG Jasmine | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 28 | LIU Sophia | - | 5% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 29 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 29% | 51% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | SEAH Dana | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 31 | HUNT Abigail S. | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | LENZ Zoe N. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 33 | FURST Chloe | - | 4% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 34 | MARKOVSKY Nina | 1% | 13% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KIM Raiden | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | GOLBIN Ariella J. | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Kaitlyn | 43% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | LIU Maggie | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | PAULUS Isabella | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | UNGERER Frieda | 33% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LEE DAYOUNG | 57% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | ZHENG Julie | < 1% | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 43 | YU Hannah | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 44 | YU Esther J. | 20% | 55% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | STIEGELMAIER AnnaGrace | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 46 | JIN Wendy | 47% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.