New Trier High School Northfield Campus - Northfield, IL, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YI Stephen | V V | V V V V V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LOVIN Vlad | V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LU Yikai | V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 3 | JI Aidan | V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 5 | BALL JT | V | V V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 6 | PORCAYO Charlie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | BENNETT Ty | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 8 | PALWAI suhas | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 9 | LIU Jacob B. | V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 10 | RIVERA Eric | V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 11 | MAHESHWARI Armanya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | DENG Zijun | V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 13 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 14 | ABBOTT Trevor | V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 15 | WEJMAN Luke | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 16 | BATES Austin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | CHOI Simon | D V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 18 | KIM David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | ZHU William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | FLORA Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | SHRIRAM Varun Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | ARATA Connor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | TAKACS Ian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | FABRI Mitchell | D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 25 | INFANTE Erik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | TIPPETT Collin | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 27 | BERGHOFF Asher | D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 28 | STRINGER Cooper | D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 29 | LULE Tony Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | DECASTRO Sean | D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 31 | NGUYEN Tien (Tim) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | TOTHY Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | KRANENBURG David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | HEIMBACH Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | DACE Mark Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | WERBA Brandon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | KING Tylon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BERKOWITZ Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | SENSABAUGH Payton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | PARK Tony Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | KRANENBURG Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | JOHNSON Alan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | CONNOLLY Shae Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | CONNOLLY Braeden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | SCOTT Joey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | JOHNSON Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | WILSON Job Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.