New Trier High School Northfield Campus - Northfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | YI Stephen | V V | V V V V V | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LOVIN Vlad | V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 3 | LU Yikai | V V | V V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 3 | JI Aidan | V V | V V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 5 | BALL JT | V | V V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 6 | PORCAYO Charlie Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 6 | BENNETT Ty | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 8 | PALWAI suhas | V D | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 9 | LIU Jacob B. | V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 10 | RIVERA Eric | V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 11 | MAHESHWARI Armanya Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 12 | DENG Zijun | V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 13 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 14 | ABBOTT Trevor | V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 15 | WEJMAN Luke | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 16 | BATES Austin Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 17 | CHOI Simon | D V | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 | |
| 18 | KIM David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 19 | ZHU William Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 20 | FLORA Jack Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | SHRIRAM Varun Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | ARATA Connor Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 23 | TAKACS Ian Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | FABRI Mitchell | D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 25 | INFANTE Erik Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | TIPPETT Collin | D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 27 | BERGHOFF Asher | D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 28 | STRINGER Cooper | D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 29 | LULE Tony Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | DECASTRO Sean | D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 31 | NGUYEN Tien (Tim) Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 32 | TOTHY Daniel Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | KRANENBURG David Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 34 | HEIMBACH Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | DACE Mark Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | WERBA Brandon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | KING Tylon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | BERKOWITZ Dylan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 39 | SENSABAUGH Payton Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | PARK Tony Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 41 | KRANENBURG Max Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 42 | JOHNSON Alan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 43 | CONNOLLY Shae Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 44 | CONNOLLY Braeden Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 45 | SCOTT Joey Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 46 | JOHNSON Andrew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 47 | WILSON Job Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.