The Sportsplex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 52% |
2 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
3 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
3 | KANG evan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
5 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
6 | BERA Enzo | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
6 | FELDMAN Drew | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
8 | CLARK Gabriel | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 12% | |
9 | LEE Andrew | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
10 | TANG Shu Hon | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
11 | ALAVE Kyle | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
12 | WANG daniel | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 6% | |
13 | BODKIN Jake M. | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
13 | BUIKEVICH Ihnat | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
15 | NG Jonathan | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
16 | LIGH Checed | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | ZHAO Lucas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
18 | KIM Theodore | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
19 | LI Maxwell | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
20 | NGO Maximus | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
21 | CARRINGTON IV William T. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
22 | XIA Eric | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
23 | ZHENG LEON | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
24 | KAZIMIR Harrison | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
25 | PORTER Dupree | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
26 | MARGULIS Jared | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
27 | CHUNG Connor | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | HERR Gabriele | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
29 | PEREIRA Beckham | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 31% | 17% | 4% |
30 | PENG Victor | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
31 | WANG Jason | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | KUMAR Arjun | 7% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
33 | PINTO Marcus | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
34 | LIM Brandon | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | HE Bowen | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 2% |
36 | ZHANG Ray | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 1% |
37 | DHANJAL Guntas | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% |
38 | MENDOZA Diwa | 8% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
38 | ORAL Derin | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | TSAO Oliver | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
41 | BADUSHOV Anton | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
42 | DESFORGES Jacques | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
43 | BIVIJI Ali | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
44 | SEN Christian | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
45 | WONG Caleb W. | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | ZHANG Emmanuel | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
47 | LEE Anderson | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
48 | SUN Bill | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
49 | SUN Andrew | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
50 | DEELY Hartigan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
51 | MCDONALD Finn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
51 | LEE Matthew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
53 | LOO Jason | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
54 | LIN Philip T. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
55 | MONTALVO Matthew | 25% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | SIMATOS Luka D. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
57 | KLAUBER Raphael | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | SINHA Ishaan | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
59 | CHERTOV Maxim | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - |
60 | YALAMA Altan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
61 | HICKOX Nathan | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
62 | VAHABZADEH Jake R. | 6% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
62 | MENON Arjun | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | |
64 | LIU Ryan | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 9% | 2% | - |
65 | LIU Alexander | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | MILLET Etienne | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
67 | LAVERDE Nicholas | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.