Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | RIGHTLER Samuel | V V D V D V | V V V V V V | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 3 | YUN Jaesun | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 5 | HOUTZ Jackson | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 6 | GHENEA George Philipe | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 7 | KOGAN Benjamin | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 8 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 9 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | KIM Shaun M. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 11 | BERRIO Carter E. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 12 | CHIN Matthew W. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 13 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | OH Triton | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 16 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 17 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | V V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | V D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 19 | AKS Ari | V D V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | PATIL Aaryan A. | V D V V D V | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | D V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | LEUNG Nathan | V D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 23 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | D V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 24 | LU Caleb Q. | V D V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 25 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | V V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | MCCLUNG Gavin | V D D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 27 | DENISON Joseph | D D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 28 | CANNON Logan T. | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 29 | LUHMAN Gabriel | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 30 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | D D D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | FIRSTMAN William B. | D D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 32 | CHTERENTAL Alex | D V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 33 | SU Landon | V D V D V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 34 | LAGROU Emerson R. | V D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 35 | WANG William | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 36 | YI Carey | D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 37 | CHAN Aidan | D V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | HAN Edward | V V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 39 | GERSTMANN Max T. | D D D V D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 40 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 41 | SHANKWILER Christopher | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 42 | ZHANG William | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 43 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 44 | HU Christopher | D D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 44 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 46 | KUSHKOV Daniel | D D D V D D | D | 4.3 | 1 | -3.3 |
| 47 | HUNG Samuel | D D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 48 | NORBORG Domingo | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 48 | CHEN Zejia | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 50 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 51 | YU Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 52 | HUSTON Theodore | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 53 | PARADIS Emmit | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 54 | SUSTAR Mir | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 55 | HENDERSON Jack | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.