Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RIGHTLER Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 2 | MAKLIN Edward P. | - | - | - | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% |
| 3 | YUN Jaesun | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 3 | SHIRPAL Oleksandr | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 5 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 28% |
| 6 | GHENEA George Philipe | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 7 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 8 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 9 | KUSHKOV Veniamin | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% | |
| 10 | KIM Shaun M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
| 11 | BERRIO Carter E. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 12 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 13 | ZHOU Aeres Z. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 46% | 14% | |
| 14 | OH Triton | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 8% |
| 15 | EICHHORN Lukas H. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 16 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | SHERWOOD Hayden F. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | AKS Ari | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% |
| 21 | WANG Nicolas | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | LEUNG Nathan | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 23 | BOUKHTIN Maxim | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | LU Caleb Q. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | RADY-PENTEK Charles A. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | MCCLUNG Gavin | 4% | 30% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | DENISON Joseph | 7% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | CANNON Logan T. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | LUHMAN Gabriel | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | ORIATTI-BRUNS Vincent M. | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | FIRSTMAN William B. | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 33 | SU Landon | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 12% |
| 34 | LAGROU Emerson R. | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG William | 18% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | YI Carey | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 16% | 2% | |
| 37 | CHAN Aidan | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | HAN Edward | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | GERSTMANN Max T. | - | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 40 | CARTAGENA Caden A. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 42 | ZHANG William | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 43 | KOCHENSPARGER III Robert L. | 13% | 40% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HU Christopher | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | HU-VAN REETH Alexander | 27% | 40% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | < 1% | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 47 | HUNG Samuel | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | NORBORG Domingo | 20% | 43% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CHEN Zejia | 22% | 45% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | HOFFMAN Pasquale | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | YU Thomas | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HUSTON Theodore | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
| 53 | PARADIS Emmit | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | SUSTAR Mir | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | HENDERSON Jack | 49% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.