The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TSAI Xiao-Qing E. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 5 | -0.8 |
| 2 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | PANT Anisha | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 3 | SUN Ruoxi | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | KNIGHT Skylar | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 6 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | D V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 7 | KOROL Neta | V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 8 | LEE Ji Ahn | V V D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 9 | SHIH Diane | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | YIN Helen | V V D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 11 | PRIETO Sofia M. | V V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 12 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | D V V V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 13 | PATTERSON Natalia | V D V D V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 14 | LI Shuang | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 15 | FERNANDES Thea | D D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | FUNG Emma | D D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | KOROL Dana | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 18 | FUNG Vera | V D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 19 | CHENG Lydia A. | V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 20 | KONG Olivia | V V D D V D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 21 | MU Allison | D D D V V V | D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 22 | MING Yue | D V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | KHOO Lauren A. | D V V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 24 | ZHANG Eunice | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 25 | PENG Serena | D D V V D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 26 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | MORADI Raiyan N. | V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CHEN Chloe I. | D D D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 29 | LUO Sandra J. | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 29 | HSIUNG Samantha | D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | YEH Marissa E. | V D D D D D | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
| 32 | ZHENG Zoe | D D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 34 | BOLES Amanda X. | V D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 35 | HOBSON Ava | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | YANG Alice | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 37 | WANG Celine S. | D V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | WELBORN Calissa | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | NICKOLOV Nora | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.