The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSAI Xiao-Qing E. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
2 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
3 | PANT Anisha | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
3 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
5 | KNIGHT Skylar | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
6 | TAKAGI Hikaru G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% | |
7 | KOROL Neta | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
8 | LEE Ji Ahn | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | SHIH Diane | - | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 5% |
10 | YIN Helen | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
11 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
12 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
13 | PATTERSON Natalia | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
14 | LI Shuang | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
15 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
16 | FUNG Emma | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
17 | KOROL Dana | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
18 | FUNG Vera | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
19 | CHENG Lydia A. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
20 | KONG Olivia | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
21 | MU Allison | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
22 | MING Yue | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
23 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
24 | ZHANG Eunice | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
25 | PENG Serena | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
26 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% | |
27 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 1% |
29 | LUO Sandra J. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
29 | HSIUNG Samantha | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
31 | YEH Marissa E. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
32 | ZHENG Zoe | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
33 | VELAZQUEZ Rosa T. | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
34 | BOLES Amanda X. | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
35 | HOBSON Ava | 3% | 21% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
36 | YANG Alice | 5% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
37 | WANG Celine S. | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
38 | WELBORN Calissa | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
39 | NICKOLOV Nora | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.