The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% |
| 2 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 3 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
| 3 | HABERMAN Hailey | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 5 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 6 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 20% | |
| 7 | FELAND Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% | |
| 8 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 9 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 10 | KAIN Isabel J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | |
| 11 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | ZMURK Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 13 | RATH Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | |
| 14 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 9% | |
| 15 | BUSH emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
| 16 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 17 | TAN Jocelyn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 18 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 7% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 20 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 21 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 24% | 3% | |
| 23 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 25 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 4% |
| 26 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 28 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 30 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 31 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 63% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 32 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | LYU Jiaqi | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 34 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHA Eugenie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 4% | |
| 38 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 20% | 2% | |
| 39 | DAYAL Saahira | 100% | 89% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | LYNCH Kristin A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 35% | 6% | |
| 41 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 42 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 43 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LOUIE Sarah | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | BROCKMANN Brooke | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 100% | 87% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | AGGARWAL Muskaan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | XU Celina | 100% | 72% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | YIN Grace | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 51 | COMES Rita | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 52 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 53 | BENNETT Vienne | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | COHEN Shaina | 100% | 65% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHEUNG Sharon | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 100% | 88% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | POON Desiree | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.