The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
| 2 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 3 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 3 | HABERMAN Hailey | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 5 | WU Amelia | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 6 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 20% | |
| 7 | FELAND Alexandra | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 8 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 9 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
| 10 | KAIN Isabel J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% | |
| 11 | ASSADOURIAN Nouneh | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | ZMURK Emma M. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% | |
| 13 | RATH Lauren N. | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 10% | |
| 14 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 36% | 9% | |
| 15 | BUSH emma | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | LAN Alice S. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 17 | TAN Jocelyn | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 18 | SMIK Leonie A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 7% |
| 19 | LIN Ashley | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 20 | BLOOMER Suzanne | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 21 | SIVAGAR Fiona | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | SINHA Zara | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | |
| 23 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 24 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 1% | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | HEPLER Sarah | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% |
| 26 | HAWKINS Laura A. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 28 | PANT Anisha | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 30 | CHIEM Karen | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 31 | LEE Samantha X. | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | LYU Jiaqi | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | DUONG Zoey | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHA Eugenie | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 38 | RICH Caroline B. | - | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 2% | |
| 39 | DAYAL Saahira | 11% | 60% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 40 | LYNCH Kristin A. | - | 2% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | |
| 41 | ENRILE Erica | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 42 | HOFMAN Haejung | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
| 43 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LOUIE Sarah | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | BROCKMANN Brooke | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 46 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | ESTRADA Ariana | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | AGGARWAL Muskaan | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | XU Celina | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 50 | YIN Grace | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | COMES Rita | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 52 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 53 | BENNETT Vienne | 25% | 49% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | LAI Amanda | 55% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 55 | COHEN Shaina | 35% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHEUNG Sharon | 80% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 58 | POON Desiree | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.