Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHEN Lydia | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | SENIC Adeline | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 3 | BATRA Chaahat | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 3 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 5 | UPTON Elizabeth | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 6 | KOSTELNY Alexis | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | ROY Layla | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 8 | HAYES Alyssa R. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 10 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | SHA Yi Ling | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | SASSE Savitri A. | V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 13 | LI Sophia M. | D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | KIM April | V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | ORVANANOS Anice | D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | D D V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 17 | KOKES Gwendolen | D V V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 18 | BASSIK Eva | V V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | WANG Jasmine | V D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | ZHENG Julie | V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 21 | GOOR Viviene E. | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | HWANG Jungmin | D V D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | TAN Eden E. | D V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | BAWA Sahana | D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | LEE Fiona E. | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | KNOPF Jenna G. | V D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 29 | SOLDATOVA Maria | D D D V D V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 30 | MANIKTALA Prisha | V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 30 | HOANG Mai | D D D D V | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 32 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 33 | SHINKAREV Olga | V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 34 | PFLAUM Philippa J. | V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 35 | GOLLNICK Mira | D V D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 36 | RAZA Nadia A. | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | SHELTON Devyn | D V D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 38 | SKOURLETOS Maria | D V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 39 | ANDERSON Elizabeth | D V D D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 40 | ZHOU Sophia | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 41 | JACOBSON Leah | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | BIODROWICZ Julia | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 43 | PARK Leah | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 44 | CUI Katelyn | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.