Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHEN Lydia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
2 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
3 | BATRA Chaahat | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
3 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
5 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
6 | KOSTELNY Alexis | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% | |
7 | ROY Layla | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
8 | HAYES Alyssa R. | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
9 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
10 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
11 | SHA Yi Ling | - | - | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
12 | SASSE Savitri A. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | LI Sophia M. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 7% | |
14 | KIM April | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
15 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% | |
16 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
17 | KOKES Gwendolen | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
18 | BASSIK Eva | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
19 | WANG Jasmine | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
20 | ZHENG Julie | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
21 | GOOR Viviene E. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
22 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
23 | HWANG Jungmin | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
24 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
25 | TAN Eden E. | 5% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
26 | BAWA Sahana | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
27 | LEE Fiona E. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
28 | KNOPF Jenna G. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
29 | SOLDATOVA Maria | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
30 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | HOANG Mai | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
32 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
33 | SHINKAREV Olga | - | 4% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
34 | PFLAUM Philippa J. | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
35 | GOLLNICK Mira | 14% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
36 | RAZA Nadia A. | 41% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
37 | SHELTON Devyn | 14% | 56% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | SKOURLETOS Maria | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
39 | ANDERSON Elizabeth | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
40 | ZHOU Sophia | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
41 | JACOBSON Leah | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
42 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | PARK Leah | 71% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | |
44 | CUI Katelyn | 7% | 44% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.