ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% |
| 2 | YUAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% |
| 3 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 5 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 6 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 7 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 8 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% |
| 9 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 41% |
| 10 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
| 11 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% | |
| 12 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 13 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | |
| 15 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% |
| 17 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | YAN Lena | 100% | 85% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% | |
| 23 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | |
| 24 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 3% |
| 29 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
| 30 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 31 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 3% |
| 36 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 94% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
| 39 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 41 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 42 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 43 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
| 46 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | |
| 47 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 48 | SHI Julia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 52 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SHUM Cindy | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 54 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | LI Angela | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | BÁEZ Sophia | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 57 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 58 | AVALIANI Elena | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 59 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 60 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | CHOU Amy R. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 65 | CASE Jocelyn | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | GIBEK Victoria | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 67 | COLLINS Audrey | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.