ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 2 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
| 3 | XIAO julie | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 5 | NATH Trisha | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 6 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 7 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% | |
| 8 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 52% |
| 9 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 10 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 11 | KHAN Alissa | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 6% | |
| 12 | TSUI Natalie | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 13 | MUND Ruth | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 14 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 15 | NAYAK Esha | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 17 | CHIANG Emily | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 18 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | YAN Lena | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | SO Catelyn | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 2% | 11% | 28% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 22 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 23 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% | |
| 24 | DAI Olivia | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | MARGULIAN Maria | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | SADOVA Olga | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | GRINBERG Aliya | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 3% |
| 29 | CHEN Ashley | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 30 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 2% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 34 | FEIG Sela | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 36 | JEONG Katie | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | FLATT Sophia | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | WU Helen | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 39 | LAGOON Miriam | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 41 | ZHANG Chenfei | 1% | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 42 | GUVEN Coco | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 43 | YEN Natalie | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | ZHENG Valentina | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Jianning | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 46 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 2% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | FESTA Carina | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 48 | SHI Julia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | ALTIRS Kate | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | YOUNG Audrey | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | KUANG TongFei | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | SHUM Cindy | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 55 | LI Angela | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | BÁEZ Sophia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 57 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 58 | AVALIANI Elena | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 59 | YU Zhiang | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 60 | MAGITSKY Leila | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ZHANG Emily | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 62 | NAYAK Anika | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 63 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | CHOU Amy R. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | CASE Jocelyn | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | GIBEK Victoria | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 67 | COLLINS Audrey | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.