ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EYER Hailey M. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
| 2 | YANG Iris | - | - | 4% | 23% | 49% | 24% | |
| 3 | YURKOVA Mariia | - | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 3 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | 5% | 37% | 57% | ||
| 5 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 6 | PAHLAVI Dahlia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 32% | |
| 7 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 8 | UNGERER Frieda | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 9 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 10 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 44% | 42% | |
| 11 | WANG Jasmine | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 24% | 3% | |
| 12 | CHEN Renee | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 13 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 10% | |
| 14 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 10% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 15 | SHIM Grace | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 16 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | FU Qihan | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 20% | |
| 18 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 19 | CASCONE Emily | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 20 | LIU Sophia | - | 10% | 57% | 30% | 4% | ||
| 21 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 22 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 23 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | RASO Olivia | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% | 1% |
| 25 | ZHOU Catherine | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 26 | WONG Sophia M. | - | 1% | 21% | 57% | 21% | ||
| 27 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | - | 12% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 28 | CALISE Ella | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 29 | ZHENG Julie | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
| 30 | LIN Victoria T. | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | NEWMAN Ariel | 20% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | DONG TianTian | 20% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HOU Wendong | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 34 | ROHRING Anna | 10% | 72% | 17% | 1% | - | ||
| 35 | SA Milla | 24% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | LI Eleanor | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | LAO Sophia | 27% | 48% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | BENNETT Abigail | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | CHENG Isa | 85% | 14% | - | - | - | ||
| 40 | FIELD Julianna | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | DALBERG Meadow | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | |
| 42 | DENYSIUK Sumajja | 5% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | KRACKELER Eliza | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.