ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 39% | |
2 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
3 | ZHENG Julie | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
3 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 38% |
5 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
6 | ZHOU Catherine | - | - | 3% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 5% |
7 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 27% | 4% | |
8 | SHIM Grace | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
9 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 45% | 19% |
10 | FIELD Julianna | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
11 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 44% | 12% | |
12 | SHMAY Anastasia | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
13 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | - | 4% | 21% | 48% | 26% | |
14 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 4% | |
15 | FENG Grace | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | LI Han | 4% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | |
17 | WANG Reese | 8% | 42% | 36% | 12% | 1% | - | |
18 | YANG Emma | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 4% | |
19 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - |
20 | MAJID Inaaya | 15% | 43% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | |
21 | LEVY Avery | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
22 | LI Eleanor | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
23 | BURGESS Logan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
24 | JOO Natalie | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 46% | 13% | |
25 | BERGEL Daphne | 4% | 23% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - | |
26 | REZA Fukaina | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
27 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
28 | GREENLEAF Ella | 20% | 47% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
29 | HAO Danica | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 4% | - | |
30 | LAO Sophia | 5% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
31 | POPOVA Polina | 22% | 49% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
32 | LIU Lucy | 3% | 26% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | |
33 | JIN Amie | 40% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
34 | LAZAR Carolina | 10% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
35 | KUMAR Ishana | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
36 | DALBERG Meadow | 34% | 45% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | CHANG Victoria | 43% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.