ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOIS Adele | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 2 | CHEN Xiaohan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 3 | LEE Sophia | - | 3% | 28% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
| 3 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 5 | TAO Hannah J. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 6 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 7 | VADASZ Ibla P. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 8 | BILILIES Sophia | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 9% | |
| 9 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 10 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% |
| 11 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 13 | FAN Grace | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | WU Helen | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 15 | JEONG Katie | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 16 | SO Catelyn | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | CHIANG Emily | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 19 | SADOVA Olga | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | MARYASH Samantha | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 21 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
| 22 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 24 | XIKES Katherine E. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 3% |
| 25 | KHAN Alissa | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 26 | NAYAK Anika | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | KIM Marley I. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 28 | NGUYEN Ella | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 29 | NATH Trisha | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 30 | BROWN Delaney | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Ashley | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 32 | DAI Olivia | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 4% | 31% | 43% | 19% | 3% | |
| 34 | NEWELL Alexia C. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 35 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 4% |
| 36 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 38 | YEN Natalie | 5% | 37% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | YU Zhiang | 1% | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 40 | HE Lizbeth | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 41 | WANG Jianning | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 42 | YOUNG Audrey | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
| 44 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 21% | |
| 45 | HORMEL Molly | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KUANG TongFei | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | XIAO julie | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 48 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LI Angela | 7% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BÁEZ Sophia | 19% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ZHENG Valentina | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | ZHANG Chenfei | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | COLLINS Audrey | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | CHERCHEVER Julia | 10% | 71% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHOU Leah | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 59 | DUBETSKY Ashley | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.